<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>406 Not Acceptable &#187; memory leaks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://406notacceptable.com/tag/memory-leaks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://406notacceptable.com</link>
	<description>406 Not Acceptable, not just an error message, but now a blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Firefox 3.0 beta 3 memory usage</title>
		<link>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox beta 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memory leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am sure everyone and their dogÂ  knows about Firefox 2&#8217;s severe memory issues. Version 2.0 was meant to use more memory than previous versions, as it was designed to cache pages in ram dependent on the amount of ram in the machine. Now this was all well and good, but something went wrong and [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions'>If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/some-different-firefox-extensions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Some different Firefox extensions'>Some different Firefox extensions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/java/netbeans-61-looks-to-be-another-fine-product/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Netbeans 6.1 looks to be another fine product'>Netbeans 6.1 looks to be another fine product</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure everyone and their dogÂ  knows about Firefox 2&#8217;s severe memory issues. Version 2.0 was meant to use more memory than previous versions, as it was designed to cache pages in ram dependent on the amount of ram in the machine. Now this was all well and good, but something went wrong and Firefox 2 decided it didn&#8217;t like to give memory back &#8212; thus, our friendly browser turned into a memory hog.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see that Mozilla have targeted the memory issue with Firefox 3, and beta 3 fixed over <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/3.0b3/releasenotes/" title="Firefox beta 3 changes">350 memory issues:</a></p>
<p><em><span style="font-size: 80%; font-weight: bold"></span>Memory usage: Over 350 individual memory leaks have been plugged, and                 a new <a href="http://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Interfacing_with_the_XPCOM_cycle_collector">XPCOM                 cycle collector</a> completely eliminates many more. Developers are continuing                 to work on optimizing memory use (by releasing cached objects more quickly) and                 reducing fragmentation. Beta 3 includes more than 50 improvements to memory use                 over the previous beta.</em></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a little test, by running both Firefox 2.0.0.12 alongside Firefox 3.0b3 for about 20 minutes to see how each handled memory under Ubuntu Gutsy. I think this image shows some quite conclusive results:</p>
<p align="center"><img src="http://speedforever.dontexist.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/firefox30b3.png" alt="Firefox memory comparision" /></p>
<p>That&#8217;s around half the memory usage for Firefox 3.0b3! Quite remarkable, I am sure you may have different results, after all Firefox is designed to use more memory if you have it &#8212; secondly, you will be browsing different sites and using different extensions to me. In this test both browsers had Adblock Plus! and NoScript installed, but turned off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve noticed Firefox 3 is much more responsive and I do like the extension searching function (sorry Mozilla, I&#8217;ve been around since 0.6 so I&#8217;ll keep on calling them extensions.) The only problem I have with the browser is the new UI, the Linux look is sub-par &#8212; Firefox 2 has a much nicer interface. Whilst the Windows &#8216;keyhole&#8217; button looks horrendous and so does the attempt at a keyhole on the Mac. Mozilla should provide the old interface with the browser, as the new one fails to deliver. The idea behind the keyhole based button is all well and good, but it needs to be implemented much, much better to be effective; I can see many users simply downloading a Firefox 2 based theme to get rid of the ugly button!</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions'>If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/some-different-firefox-extensions/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Some different Firefox extensions'>Some different Firefox extensions</a></li>
<li><a href='http://406notacceptable.com/java/netbeans-61-looks-to-be-another-fine-product/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Netbeans 6.1 looks to be another fine product'>Netbeans 6.1 looks to be another fine product</a></li>
</ol></p><hr />
<p><small>&copy; jim for <a href="http://406notacceptable.com">406 Not Acceptable</a>, 2008. |
<a href="http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/">Permalink</a> |
<a href="http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/#comments">3 comments</a> |
Add to
<a href="http://del.icio.us/post?url=http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/&amp;title=Firefox 3.0 beta 3 memory usage">del.icio.us</a>
<br/>
Post tags: <a href="http://406notacceptable.com/tag/firefox/" rel="tag">Firefox</a>, <a href="http://406notacceptable.com/tag/firefox-beta-3/" rel="tag">Firefox beta 3</a>, <a href="http://406notacceptable.com/tag/memory-leaks/" rel="tag">memory leaks</a>, <a href="http://406notacceptable.com/tag/mozilla/" rel="tag">Mozilla</a><br/>
</small></p>
<p><small>Feed enhanced by <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/my-projects/wordpress-plugin-better-feed-rss/'>Better Feed</a> from  <a href='http://planetozh.com/blog/'>Ozh</a></small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-30-beta-3-memory-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
