<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you could Only Choose Four Firefox Extensions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/</link>
	<description>406 Not Acceptable, not just an error message, but now a blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:19:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>Nice to hear from you Wladimir. All I ever hear on forums is Adblock, Adblock, Adblock... then someone will suggest to use Adblock Plus. maybe people just get the names confused.

Not all extensions are marked for all versions of 2, I&#039;ve had things crap out on me on occasions. Again extensions can be a killer when using a beta of 3 or Minefield. I&#039;d rather use the extension that mess about in about:.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to hear from you Wladimir. All I ever hear on forums is Adblock, Adblock, Adblock&#8230; then someone will suggest to use Adblock Plus. maybe people just get the names confused.</p>
<p>Not all extensions are marked for all versions of 2, I&#8217;ve had things crap out on me on occasions. Again extensions can be a killer when using a beta of 3 or Minefield. I&#8217;d rather use the extension that mess about in about:.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wladimir Palant</title>
		<link>http://406notacceptable.com/internet/firefox-internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>Wladimir Palant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 11:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.406notacceptable.com/internet/if-you-could-only-choose-four-firefox-extensions/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Adblock is barely used nowadays - Adblock Plus is by far the most popular extension on addons.mozilla.org.

As to &quot;forcing&quot; compatibility with an extension - this was really only an issue around Firefox 1.5. By now all extensions are marked compatible with Firefox 2.0.0.* meaning that they don&#039;t need an update on minor Firefox releases. And in Minefield you can set the pref extensions.checkCompatibility to false which will allow installing incompatible extensions (use carefully, often extensions aren&#039;t marked compatible for a reason).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adblock is barely used nowadays &#8211; Adblock Plus is by far the most popular extension on addons.mozilla.org.</p>
<p>As to &#8220;forcing&#8221; compatibility with an extension &#8211; this was really only an issue around Firefox 1.5. By now all extensions are marked compatible with Firefox 2.0.0.* meaning that they don&#8217;t need an update on minor Firefox releases. And in Minefield you can set the pref extensions.checkCompatibility to false which will allow installing incompatible extensions (use carefully, often extensions aren&#8217;t marked compatible for a reason).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

